DEFINE THE PROBLEM

You need to begin the solution to a design problem with a clear, unambiguous definition of the problem. Unlike an analysis problem, a design problem often begins as a vague, abstract idea in the mind of the designer. Creating a clear definition of a design problem is more difficult than, defining an analysis problem. The definition of a design problem may evolve through a series of steps or processes as you develop a more complete understanding of the problem.


Identify and Establish the Need
Engineering design activity always occurs in response to a human need. Before you can develop a problem definition statement for a design problem, you need to recognize the need for a new product, system, or machine. Thomas Newcomen saw the need for a machine to pump the water from the bottom of coal mines in England. Recognizing this human need provided him the stimulus for designing the first steam engine in 1712.
Before engineers can clearly define a design problem, they must see and understand this need.

Although engineers are generally involved in defining the problem, they may not be the ones who initially recognize the need. In private industry, market forces generally establish the need for a new design. A company's survival depends on producing a product that people will buy and can be manufactured and sold at a profit. Ultimately, consumers establish a need, because they will purchase and use a product that they
perceive as meeting a need for comfort, health, recreation, transportation, shelter, and so on. Likewise, the citizens of a government decide whether they need safe drinking water, roads and highways, libraries, schools, fire protection, and so on.

The perceived need, however, may not be the real need. Before you delve into the details of producing a solution, you need to make sure you have enough information to generate a clear, unambiguous problem definition that addresses the real need. The following example illustrates the importance of understanding the need before attempting a solution.

Example: Automobile Airbag Inflation - How Not to Solve a Problem
A company that manufactures automobile airbags has a problem with an unacceptably high rate of failure in the inflation of the bag. During testing, 10 percent of the bags do not fully inflate. An engineer is assigned the job of solving the problem. At first the engineer defines the problem as a failure in the materials and construction of the inflation device. The engineer begins to solve this problem by producing a more robust inflation device. After considerable effort, the engineer discovers that improving the inflation device does not change the failure rate in the bags. Eventually, this engineer re-examines the initial definition of the problem. The company investigates the airbag inflation  problem further and discovers that a high degree of variability in the tightness of folds is
responsible for the failure of some bags to inflate. At the time the bags were folded and packed by people on an assembly line. With a more complete understanding of the need, the engineer redefined the problem as one of increasing the consistency in tightness of the folds in the bags. The final solution to this problem is a machine that automatically folds the bags.

Often the apparent need is not the real need. A common tendency is to begin generating a solution to an apparent problem without understanding the problem. This approach is exactly the wrong way to begin solving a problem such as this. You would be generating solutions to a problem that has never been defined.
People have a natural tendency to attack the current solution to a problem rather than the problem itself. Attacking a current solution may eliminate inadequacies but will not produce a creative and innovative solution. For example, the engineer at the airbag company could have only looked at the current method for folding airbags-using humans on an assembly line. The engineer might have solved the problem with inconsistent tightness by modifying the assembly line procedure. However, the final solution to the problem proved to be more cost effective and reliable, in addition to producing a superior consistency in the tightness of the folds.



  • READ MORE.......



  • ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS
    Education Transfer Plan
    Prepared by
    Seyyed Khandani, Ph.D.
    skhandani@dvc.edu


    for STEP BY STEP GUIDE illustrator simple tutorial please visit.........
    www.illustratorsimpletutorial.blogspot.com

    ---or---

  • www.illustrator-simple-tutorial.com


  • THE DESIGN PROCESS

    The basic five-step process usually used in a problem-solving works for design problems as well. Since design problems are usually defined more vaguely and have a multitude of correct answers, the process may require backtracking and iteration. Solving a design problem is a contingent process and the solution is subject to unforeseen complications and changes as it develops. Until the Wright brothers actually built and tested their early gliders, they did not know the problems and difficulties they would face controlling a powered plane.



    The five steps used for solving design problems are:
    1. Define the problem
    2. Gather pertinent information
    3. Generate multiple solutions
    4. Analyze and select a solution
    5. Test and implement the solution
    The first step in the design process is the problem definition. This definition usually contains a listing of the product or customer requirements and specially information about product functions and features among other things. In the next step, relevant information for the design of the product and its functional specifications is obtained. A survey regarding the availability of similar products in the market should be performed at this stage. Once the details of the design are clearly identified, the design team with inputs from test, manufacturing, and marketing teams generates multiple alternatives to achieve the goals and the requirements of the design. Considering cost, safety, and other criteria for selection, the more promising alternatives are selected for further analysis.
    Detail design and analysis step enables a complete study of the solutions and result in identification of the final design that best fits the product requirements. Following this step, a prototype of the design is constructed and functional tests are performed to verify and possibly modify the design.
    When solving a design problem, you may find at any point in the process that you need to go back to a previous step. The solution you chose may prove unworkable for any number of reasons and may require redefining the problem, collecting more information, or generating different solutions. This continuous iterative process is represented in the following Figure.
    This document intends to clarify some of the details involved in implementing the design process. Therefore a description of the details involved in each step of the design process is listed below. Although the descriptions of the activities within each step may give the impression that the steps are sequential and independent from each other, the iterative nature of the application of the process should be kept in mind throughout the document.


    ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS
    Education Transfer Plan
    Prepared by
    S
  • Read more........
  • ENGINEERING DESIGN

    Most engineering designs can be classified as inventions-devices or systems that are
    created by human effort and did not exist before or are improvements over existing
    devices or systems. Inventions, or designs, do not suddenly appear from nowhere. They are the result of bringing together technologies to meet human needs or to solve problems. Sometimes a design is the result of someone trying to do a task more quickly or efficiently. Design activity occurs over a period of time and requires a step-by-step methodology.

    We described engineers primarily as problem solvers. What distinguishes design from other types of problem solving is the nature of both the problem and the solution. Design problems are open ended in nature, which means they have more than one correct solution. The result or solution to a design problem is a system that possesses specified properties.

    Design problems are usually more vaguely defined than analysis problems. Suppose that you are asked to determine the maximum height of a snowball given an initial velocity and release height. This is an analysis problem because it has only one answer. If you change the problem statement to read, "Design a device to launch a 1-pound snowball to a height of at least 160 feet," this analysis problem becomes a design problem. The solution to the design problem is a system having specified properties (able to launch a snowball 160 feet), whereas the solution to the analysis problem consisted of the properties of a given system (the height of the snowball). The solution to a design problem is therefore open ended, since there are many possible devices that can launch a snowball to a given height. The original problem had a single solution: the maximum
    height of the snowball, determined from the specified initial conditions.
    Solving design problems is often an iterative process: As the solution to a design problem evolves, you find yourself continually refining the design. While implementing the solution to a design problem, you may discover that the solution you've developed is unsafe, too expensive, or will not work. You then "go back to the drawing board" and modify the solution until it meets your requirements. For example, the Wright brothers'
    airplane did not fly perfectly the first time. They began a program for building an airplane by first conducting tests with kites and then gliders. Before attempting powered flight, they solved the essential problems of controlling a plane's motion in rising, descending, and turning. They didn't construct a powered plane until after making more than 700 successful glider flights. Design activity is therefore cyclic or iterative in nature, whereas
    analysis problem solving is primarily sequential.
    The solution to a design problem does not suddenly appear in a vacuum. A good solution requires a methodology or process. There are probably as many processes of design as there are engineers. Therefore, this lesson does not present a rigid "cookbook" approach to design but presents a general application of the five-step problem-solving methodology associated with the design process. The process described here is general, and you can adapt it to the particular problem you are trying to solve



    ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS
    Education Transfer Plan
    Prepared by
    Seyyed Khandani, Ph.D.



  • Read more........
  • Design Considerations

    Sometimes the strength required of an element in a system is an important factor in the determination of the geometry and the dimensions of the element. In such a situation we say that strength is an important design consideration. When we use the expression design consideration, we are referring to some characteristic that influences the design of the element or, perhaps, the entire system. Usually quite a number of such characteristics must be considered and prioritized in a given design situation. Many of the important ones are as follows (not necessarily in order of importance):
    1 Functionality
    2 Strength/stress
    3 Distortion/deflection/stiffness
    4 Wear
    5 Corrosion
    6 Safety
    7 Reliability
    8 Manufacturability
    9 Utility
    10 Cost
    11 Friction
    12 Weight
    13 Life
    14 Noise
    15 Styling
    16 Shape
    17 Size
    18 Control
    19 Thermal properties
    20 Surface
    21 Lubrication
    22 Marketability
    23 Maintenance
    24 Volume
    25 Liability
    26 Remanufacturing/resource recovery

    Some of these characteristics have to do directly with the dimensions, the material, the processing, and the joining of the elements of the system. Several characteristics may be interrelated, which affects the configuration of the total system.




    Mechanical Engineering
    McGraw−Hill Primis
    ISBN: 0−390−76487−6
    Text:
    Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design,
    Eighth Edition
    Budynas−Nisbett
    Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design,
    Eighth Edition
    Budynas−Nisbett


  • Read more........
  •