FORMING - DRILLING - REAMING - BORING

FORMING
Forming is the process of turning convex, or concave or of any irregular shape. Form turning may be accomplished by the following methods:
1.using a forming tool
2.combining cross-land longitudinal feed.
3.tracing or coping a template.

DRILLING
Drilling is the operation of producing a cylindrical hole in a work piece by the rotating cutting edge of a cutter known as drill.

REAMING
Reaming is a process of finishing and sizing a hole, which has been drilled or bored. The tool used is called reamer, which has multiple cutting edges. The reamer is held on tailstock spindle, either direct or through a drill chucks and is held stationary while the work is revolved at a very low speed. The feed varies from 0.5 to 2mm per revolution.

BORING
Boring is the operation of enlarging and truing a hole produced by drilling, punching, casting or forging.
1.The work is revolved in a chuck or a faceplate and the tool, which is fitted to the tool post, is fed in to the work.
2.The work is clamped on the carriage and a boring bar holding the tool is supported between the centers and made to revolve.
fr. NTTF ( NETTUR TECHNICAL TRAINING FOUNDATION)


  • Read more........
  • Torsion

    A bar is under torsional stress when it is held fast at one end, and a force acts at the other end to twist the bar. In a round bar (Fig. 4.9) with a constant force acting, the straight-line ab becomes the helix ad, and a radial line in the cross-section, ob, moves to the position ad. The angle bad remains constant while the angle bod increases with the length of the bar. Each cross section of the bar tends to shear off the one adjacent to it, and in any cross section the shearing stress at any point is normal to a radial line drawn through the point. Within the shearing proportional limit, a radial line of the cross section remains straight after the twisting force has been applied, and the unit shearing stress at any point is proportional to its distance from the axis.
    The twisting moment, T, is equal to the product of the resultant, P, of the twisting forces, multiplied by its distance from the axis, p. Resisting moment, T,, in torsion, is equal to the sum of the moments of the unit
    shearing stresses acting along a cross section with respect to the axis of the bar. If d A is an elementary area of the section at a distance of z units from the axis of a circular shaft [Fig. 4.9 (b)], and c is the distance from
    the axis to the outside of the cross section where the unit shearing stress is Z, then the unit shearing stress acting on dA is (ZZ/C) dA, its moment with respect to the axis is (zz2/c) dA, and the sum of all the moments
    of the unit shearing stresses on the cross section is f (rz2/c) dA. In this expression the factor fz2 dA is the polar moment of inertia of the section with respect to the axis. Denoting this by J the resisting moment may be written zJ/c.
    The polar moment of inertia of a surface about an axis through its center of gravity and perpendicular to the surface is the sum of the products obtained by multiplying each elementary area by the square of its distance from the center of gravity of its surface; it is equal to the sum of the moments of inertia taken with respect to two axes in the plane of the surface at right angles to each other passing through the center of gravity section of a round shaft.
    The analysis of torsional shearing stress distribution along noncircular cross sections of bars under torsion is complex. By drawing two lines at right angles through the center of gravity of a section before twisting,
    and observing the angular distortion after twisting, it has been found from many experiments that in noncircular sections the shearing unit stresses are not proportional to their distances from the axis. Thus in a rectangular bar there is no shearing stress at the comers of the sections, and the stress at the middle of the wide side is greater than at the middle of the narrow side. In an elliptical bar the shearing stress is greater along the flat side than at the round side.

    Plastics
    Engineered
    Product
    Design
    Dominick Rosato and
    Donald Rosato
    ELSEVIER


  • Read more........
  • Insulated Runners

    The insulated runner system (Figure 41) allows the molten polymer to flow into the runner, and then cool to form an insulating layer of solid plastic along the walls of the runner. The insulating layer reduces the diameter of the runner and helps maintain the temperature of the molten portion of the melt as it awaits the next shot. The insulated runner system should be designed so that, while the runner volume does not exceed the cavity volume, all of the molten polymer in the runners is injected into the mold during each shot. This full consumption is necessary to prevent excess build-up of the insulating skin and to minimize any drop in melt temperature. The many advantages of insulated runner systems, compared with conventional runner systems, include: • Less sensitivity to the requirements for balanced runners. • Reduction in material shear. • More consistent volume of polymer per part. • Faster molding cycles. • Elimination of runner scrap – less regrind. • Improved part finish. • Decreased tool wear. However, the insulated runner system also has disadvantages. The increased level of technology required to manufacture and operate the mold results in: • Generally more complicated mold design. • Generally higher mold costs. • More difficult start-up procedures until running correctly. • Possible thermal degradation of the polymer melt. • More difficult color changes. • Higher maintenance costs. Product and Mold Design d9b604f1c18a4896b020a210866ec775.

    Standards ANSI ISO

    Standards If a machinist in a machine shop in a remote location is required to make a part for a US-built commercial aircraft, he or she must understand the drawings. This requires worldwide, standardized drafting practices. Many countries support a national standards development effort in addition to international participation. In the United States, the two groups of standards that are most influential are developed by the standards development bodies administered by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). See Chapter 6 for a comparison of US and ISO standards. ANSI The ANSI administers the guidelines for standards creation in the United States. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers sponsors the development of the Y14 series of standards. The 26 standards in the series cover most facets of engineering drawings and related documents. Many of the concepts about how to read an engineering drawing presented in this chapter come from these standards. In addition to the Y14 series of standards, the complete library should also possess the B89 Dimensional Measurement standards series and the B46 Surface Texture standard. ISO The ISO, created in 1946, helped provide a structure to rebuild the world economy (primarily Europe) after World War II. Even though the United States has only one vote in international standards development, the US continues to propose many of the concepts presented in the ISO drafting standards. Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook Paul J. Drake, Jr. McGraw-Hill New York San Francisco Washington , D.C. Auckland Bogata Caracas Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal New Delhi San Juan Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto