General Considerations in Machine Design

Following are the general considerations in designing a machine component :
1. Type of load and stresses caused by the load. The load, on a machine component, may act in several ways due to which the internal stresses are set up. The various types of load and stresses are discussed in chapters 4 and 5.
2. Motion of the parts or kinematics of the machine. The successful  operation of any machine depends largely upon the simplest arrangement of the parts which will give the motion required. 

The motion of the parts may be :
(a) Rectilinear motion which includes unidirectional and reciprocating motions.
(b) Curvilinear motion which includes rotary, oscillatory and simple harmonic.
(c) Constant velocity.
(d) Constant or variable acceleration.
3. Selection of materials. It is essential that a designer should have a thorough knowledge of the properties of the materials and their behaviour under working conditions. Some of the important characteristics of materials are : strength, durability, flexibility, weight, resistance to heat and corrosion, ability to cast, welded or  hardened, machinability, electrical conductivity, etc.
4. Form and size of the parts. The form and size are based on judgement. The smallest practicable cross-section may be used, but it may be checked that the stresses induced in the designed cross-section are reasonably safe. In order to design any machine part for form and size, it is necessary to know the forces which the part must sustain. It is also important to anticipate any suddenly applied or impact load which may cause failure.
5. Frictional resistance and lubrication. There is always a loss of power due to frictional resistance and it should be noted that the friction of starting is higher than that of running friction. It is, therefore, essential that a careful attention must be given to the matter of lubrication of all surfaces which move in contact with others, whether in rotating, sliding, or rolling bearings.
6. Convenient and economical features. In designing, the operating features of the machine should be carefully studied. The starting, controlling and stopping levers should be located on the basis of convenient handling. The adjustment for wear must be provided employing the various takeup devices and arranging them so that the alignment of parts is preserved. If parts are to be changed for different products or replaced on account of wear or breakage, easy access should be provided and the necessity of removing other parts to accomplish this should be avoided if possible.
The economical operation of a machine which is to be used for production, or for the processing of material should be studied, in order to learn whether it has the maximum capacity consistent with the production of good work.
7. Use of standard parts. The use of standard parts is closely related to cost, because the cost of standard
or stock parts is only a fraction of the cost of similar parts made to order. The standard or stock parts should be used whenever possible ; parts for which patterns are already in existence such as gears, pulleys and bearings and parts which may be selected from regular shop stock such as screws, nuts and pins. Bolts and
studs should be as few as possible to avoid the delay caused by changing drills, reamers and taps and also to
decrease the number of wrenches required. 8. Safety of operation. Some machines are dangerous to operate, especially those which are speeded up to insure production at a maximum rate. Therefore, any moving part of a machine which is within the zone of a worker is considered an accident hazard and may be the cause of an injury. It is, therefore, necessary that a designer should always provide safety devices for the safety of the
operator. The safety appliances should in no way interfere with operation of the machine.
9. Workshop facilities. A design engineer should be familiar with the limitations of his employer’s workshop, in order to avoid the necessity of having work done in some other workshop. It is sometimes necessary to plan and supervise the workshop operations and to draft methods for casting, handling and machining special parts.
10. Number of machines to be manufactured. The number of articles or machines to be manufactured affects the design in a number of ways. The engineering and shop costs which are called fixed charges or overhead expenses are distributed over the number of articles to be manufactured. If only a few articles are to be made, extra expenses are not justified unless the machine is large or of some special design. An order calling for small number of the product will not permit any undue expense in the workshop processes, so that the designer should restrict his specification to standard parts as much as possible.
11. Cost of construction. The cost of construction of an article is the most important consideration involved in design. In some cases, it is quite possible that the high cost of an article may immediately bar it from further considerations. If an article has been invented and tests of hand made samples have shown that it has commercial value, it is then possible to justify the expenditure of a considerable sum of money in the design and development of automatic machines to produce the article, especially if it can be sold in large numbers. The aim of design engineer under all conditions, should be to reduce the manufacturing cost to the minimum.
12. Assembling. Every machine or structure must be assembled as a unit before it can function. Large units must often be assembled in the shop, tested and then taken to be transported to their place of service. The final location of any machine is important and the design engineer must anticipate the exact location and the local facilities for erection.






A TEXTBOOK OF Machine Design
(S.I. UNITS)
[A Textbook for the Students of B.E. / B.Tech.,
U.P.S.C. (Engg. Services); Section ‘B’ of A.M.I.E. (I)]
2005
EURASIA PUBLISHING HOUSE (PVT.) LTD.
RAM NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 055




  • Read more........
  • Communication of designs

    The most essential design activity, therefore, is the production of a final description of the artefact. This has to be in a form that is understandable to those who will make the artefact. For this reason, the most widely-used form of communication is the drawing. For a simple artefact, such as a door-handle, one drawing would probably be enough, but for a larger more complicated artefact such as a whole building the number of drawings may well run into hundreds, and for the most complex artefacts, such as chemical process plants, aeroplanes or major bridges, then thousands of drawings may be necessary.
    These drawings will range from rather general descriptions (such as plans, elevations and general arrangement drawings) that give an 'overview' of the artefact, to the most specific (such as sections and details) that give precise instructions on how the artefact is to be made. Because they have to communicate precise instructions, with minimal likelihood of misunderstanding, all the drawings are themselves subject to agreed rules, codes  and conventions.
    These codes cover aspects such as how to lay out on one drawing the different views of an artefact relative to each other, how to indicate different kinds of material, and how to specify dimensions. Learning to read and to make these drawings is an important part of design education.
    The drawings will often contain annotations of additional information. Dimensions are one such kind of  annotation. Written instructions may also be added to the drawings, such as notes on the materials to be used (as in Figure 1).

    Other kinds of specifications as well as drawings may also be required. For example, the designer is often required to produce lists of all the separate components and parts that will make up the complete artefact, and an accurate count of the numbers of each component to be used. Written specifications of the standards of workmanship or quality of manufacture may also be necessary.
    Sometimes, an artefact is so complex, or so unusual, that the designer makes a complete three-dimensional mock-up or prototype version in order to communicate the design. However, there is no doubt that drawings are the most useful form of communication of the description of an artefact that has yet to be made. Drawings are very good at conveying an understanding of what the final artefact has to be like, and that understanding is essential to the person who has to make the artefact. 
    Nowadays it is not always a person who makes the artefact; some artefacts are made by machines that have no direct human operator. These machines might be fairly sophisticated robots, or just simpler numerically-controlled tools such as lathes or milling machines. In these cases, therefore, the final specification of a design prior to manufacture might not be in the form of drawings but in theform of a string of digits stored on a disk, or in computer software that controls the machine's actions. It is therefore possible to have a design process in which no final communication drawings are made, but the ultimate purpose of the design process remains the communication of proposals for a new artefact.

    Engineering Design Methods
    Strategies for Product Design
    THIRD EDITION
    Nigel Cross
    The Open University, Mi/ton Keynes, UK
    JOHN WILEY & SONS, LTD
    Chichester- New York. Weinheim • Brisbane. Singapore. Toronto



  • Read more........
  • Classifications of Machine Design

    The machine design may be classified as follows :
    1. Adaptive design. In most cases, the designer’s work is concerned with adaptation of existing designs. This type of design needs no special  knowledge or skill and can be attempted by designers of ordinary technical training. The designer only makes minor alternation or modification in the existing designs of the product.

    2. Development design. This type of design needs considerable scientific training and design ability in order to modify the existing designs into a new idea by adopting a new material or different method of manufacture. In this case, though the designer starts from the existing design, but the final product may differ quite markedly from the original product.

    3. New design. This type of design needs lot of research, technical ability and creative thinking. Only those designers who have personal qualities of a sufficiently high order can take up the work of a new design.
    The designs, depending upon the methods used, may be classified as follows :
    (a) Rational design. This type of design depends upon mathematical formulae of principle of
    mechanics.
    (b) Empirical design. This type of design depends upon empirical formulae based on the practice and past experience.
    (c) Industrial design. This type of design depends upon the production aspects to manufacture any machine component in the industry.
    (d) Optimum design. It is the best design for the given objective function under the specified constraints. It may be achieved by minimising the undesirable effects.
    (e) System design. It is the design of any complex mechanical system like a motor car.
    (f) Element design. It is the design of any element of the mechanical system like piston, crankshaft, connecting rod, etc.
    (g) Computer aided design. This type of design depends upon the use of computer systems to assist in the creation, modification, analysis and optimisation of a design.






    A TEXTBOOK OF Machine Design
    (S.I. UNITS)
    [A Textbook for the Students of B.E. / B.Tech.,
    U.P.S.C. (Engg. Services); Section ‘B’ of A.M.I.E. (I)]
    2005
    EURASIA PUBLISHING HOUSE (PVT.) LTD.
    RAM NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 055





  • Read more........
  • Computer-Aided Design and Manufacture of Injection Forging

    The design activity is responsible not only for the performance and appearance of the product but also for the cost of the component. Design, therefore, cannot be an isolated activity but must address all available manufacturing routes, with a view to optimizing the quality and cost of the component. With reference to nett-forming, the design exercise is conducted not only to specify the component-form but also to address all manufacturing constraints—machine, material, tooling, and processing conditions. 

    Computer-aided “design for manufacture” is currently the main form of implementing of the “concurrent
    engineering.” To enable this, CAD/CAM is popularly used as a design approach. Using CAD/CAM
    approaches, simultaneous design would be effected efficiently by supporting the designer with information
    on all possible resources required for the design and manufacture of components. Some CAD/CAM
    systems [42] have demonstrated the potential for the development into decision-support systems for
    component/tool design.
    Computer-aided design and manufacture for nett-forming by injection forging is being developed as
    an aspect of research associated with the development of a decision-support system [64].

    Methodology 
    In order to develop a decision-support system for component/tool design using a CAD/CAM approach, several design/evaluation methods have been developed [58, 60, 64–68]. These are described briefly in the following texts.

    Geometric Modeling
    The popular strategy used for the development of the design-support systems for forging was to evolve
    a 2D-CAD system for component and tool design. The system was linked to a knowledge-based system
    to enable the evaluation of manufacturability. Subsequent to the evaluation of the geometry, the component
    was transferred to a CAD software to enable detailed design. This approach required the design to operate in several software environments. An integrated system, supported by solid modeling, would enable design and assessment of a component more efficiently. A solid modeling-approach—principal feature modeling—was used to enable component-design for forging within a solid modeling environment [65, 66]; the approach enables integration of currently available 2D-based knowledge-based systems.
    Design for manufacture requires that the component form is specified in a modular form in order to enable the evaluation of the design. The component may be defined as a combination of primitive forms as is the case in “design by features;” alternatively, the primitive forms which constitute the component may be extracted and identified automatically. Unfortunately, both these approaches are currently at a stage of refinement which only allows their applications to a limited range of component forms. Principal feature modeling [67] combines the strategies of both “design by feature” and “feature recognition” to enable efficient modeling and feature manipulation; the approach was proven to be particularly efficient for the modeling of forging/machining components [65]. Designing is attended to with reference to a prescribed set of performance requirements rather than to prescribed form features. The principal features, which represent the principal geometric profiles of a component, may be defined by the designer using arbitrary geometry—a group of curves on a plane or a curved surface. The principal features which have been generated are linked, exclusively, to a set of prescribed attributes which are catalogued in a database.
    The solid model of the component may be created by geometric manipulation of a principal feature; several principal features may be defined for more complex components. Subsequent to the definition of the principal features for a particular component; local features may be added to produce the first iteration of the “performance” model of the component. The form of the additional features is generated
    by the modification of the principal geometric entities; these additional features are extracted and
    classified as individual manufacturing features. In circumstances where components cannot be modeled by
    defining principal features, the model can be created by other approaches. This will enable the prescription
    of the principal feature by the extraction of the curves on a feature plane, which is prescribed by the designer. In comparison with the “design by feature” approach, the proposed approach [67] does not require a pre-defined feature library that would constrain the flexibility of the system. Further, the difficulty and complexity of the routines for the recognition of form features are reduced since the principal features, which are recorded in the system, provide auxiliary geometric and topologic information of the component model; this simplifies the recognition of manufacturing features.



    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN,
    ENGINEERING, AND MANUFACTURING
    Systems Techniques And Applications
    VOLUME
    V I
    Editor
    CORNELIUS LEONDES
    Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.
    CRC Press
    MANUFACTURING
    SYSTEMS PROCESSES



  • Read more........
  •